Les said, the better II

I posted very early this morning that Jesus said mean, fucked up things. Some of you are offended, I’m sure. Heck, I’m offended. How could I say such a thing? Well, I was reading the Westboro Baptists Church FAQ which posts much theology which is at least as logically consistent as Catholic theology and in some ways more consistent. I mean, isn’t God loving everybody sort of inconsistent with the idea of hell? I love you so much I’m going to torture you for all eternity? They’ve got it all figured out at Westboro.

If you want to cite that FAQ in a research paper, your bibliography would look like:

“Westboro Baptist Church FAQ” God Hates Fags Assessed April 23, 2005. <http://www.godhatesfags.com/main/faq.html>

I’ve been thinking more about the apocalypse. Apparently, sometime around the time all the fundies get beamed into outer space, there exists years of peace under a one world government. The economy is controlled and cushioned from ups and downs. All government is secular. Ummmmm . . . so in the coming times, we have no fundies, a secular government, a universal brotherhood of man/ universal sisterhood of women, economic prosperity and a secular government. . . . and this is bad.
One the one hand, you have really easy to understand, really clear principles expressed in a straightforward way by the foremost authority on the subject: “Blessed are the peacemakers.” On the other hand you have a confusing, coded account of persecution, which is difficult to decipher and written down by lesser authorities: Book of Revelations. And which do we go with now?
One interpretation is that Jesus was actually sent by Satan! And that’s why Christianity is so screwed up, because we were fooled by a false prophet. This is not an avenue of thought I want to pursue. Besides, I can’t imagine Satan blessing peacemakers.
The Catholic hierarchy used to try to keep bibles out of the hands of the unwashed masses. They believed that it was necessary to be in a state of grace and to have an education to understand what the bible is trying to say. Not everybody could just pick it up and understand it. You needed some context and some theology and some knowledge of the historical context in which it was recorded. Popularly, this prohibition is now seen as a terrible tyranny. But, you know, there’s something to it. So, another interpretation is that Satan is misleading people by making them concentrate on, and misunderstand, a part of the bible that is weird, instead of going for the very clear, straightforward pronouncements.
Haliburton might be the Harlot of Babylon, but I can’t see Bush as the antichrist, because I can’t see him managing to bring about peace or a stable economy. (I know stable doesn’t always mean good, but I think that gross inequality is neither stable, nor peaceful, so I’m going to rule it out.) In the future, we’ve got a secular, peaceful, stable government coming. Sign me up. I really can’t see that as bad. Also, no fundamentalists. The apocalypse will be a coming golden age. Where do I get my mark of the beast?
I’m going to hell
No, seriously, I’m so confused by this type of religion. I see it as intrinsically disordered. fundamentalists are objectively disordered. But with help, they can change. It’s best to avoid support group sort of situations because they might be overcome with temptation and fall back into fundamentalism. they should be kept separated and avoid contact with each other as much as possible.
I can’t stop being sarcastic for one minute. I’ve done too much paper writing.

Bibliography for this post

DeMarinis, Paul, “Cincinnati.” Music as a Second Language, Lovely Music, Ltd. CD 3011, 1991
“Laughter Yoga a Break Through in Stress Management,” Laughter Yoga: Laughter Club International / Dr. Katari’s School of Laughter Yoga Assessed April 23, 2005. <http://www.laughteryoga.org/>
91Angels, Online Posting. No longer extant. <http://www.livejournal.com/users/celestehblog/66886.html?thread=15686#t15686>
O’Reilly, Bill. The Radio Factor with Bill O’Reilly, Westwood One, April 13, 2005. “O’Reilly again warns that same-sex marriage could lead to calls for nuptials with goats” Ed. Marcia Kuntz. April 15, 2005. Media Matters for America. Assessed April 23, 2005. <http://mediamatters.org/items/200504150005>
Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism, dir. and prod. Robert Greenwald, Carolina Productions. 2004. Transcript Assessed April 22, 2005.
<http://www.outfoxed.org/docs/outfoxed_transcript.pdf>
“Rush Limbaugh.” April 22, 2005. Wikipedia. Assessed April 22, 2005. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh>
Stevens, Dana. “surfergirl: TV and Popular Culture” Slate Jan. 27, 2005. (Interview with Jeanne Hopkins half way down the page) Assessed April 23, 2005. >http://slate.msn.com/id/2112706/<
“Theory Behind BrainWave Generator.” Brain Wave Generator. October 3, 2004. Noromaa Solutions Oy. Assessed April 21, 2005. <http://www.bwgen.com/theory.htm>
Tag: Celesteh

St. Malachy, hundreds of years ago had some prophesies about all the popes. He gave them all nicknames. And then after they ran, out, why, that would be the end of everything. We’re on the last one right now.

Gloria olivæ
The Benedictine order traditionally said this Pope would come from their order, since a branch of the Benedictine order is called the Olivetans. St Benedict is said to have prophesied that before the end of the world, a member of his order would be Pope and would triumphantly lead the Church in its fight against evil. While the Holy Father chose the name “Benedict”, this does not seem enough to fulfil the prophecy. Nor is it clear how Benedict XVI (a Bavarian) is “Glory of the Olives”. Since he is said to have remarked in the Conclave after saying he would take the name Benedict that it was partly to honour Benedict XV, a pope of peace and reconciliation, perhaps Benedict XVI will be a peacemaker in the Church or in the World, and thus carry the olive branch.

In like 1998, one person posted a long long long speculation of what this running out of popes might mean. He gives a bunch of scenarios. My favorite:

A possible scenario, but the most distasteful for the Catholic Church, is that the original prophecies of St. Malachy (111 popes) are correct and at the passing of John Paul II the college of Cardinals elects a Pope who is not a true believer and he becomes the false Prophet. This could be devastating to the Catholic believers between the election of the Gloria Olivae Pope and the Rapture. This would indicate that the prophecies of Malachy were not from the Lord. If he (the Gloria Olivae) is a false pope, it will be extremely detrimental to the marginal or carnal Christians. A large portion of the Catholics (968 million) will accept the Gloria Olivae Pope as the Vicar of Christ and if he is the false prophet, he will turn them to the Antichrist and indicate he (the Antichrist) is the Savior of the world. This would be the False Religion of Revelation 17, Babylon the Harlot.

Now, I’m note really down with all of this “the rapture is coming stuff.” But I did find myself wondering the other day if the Pope even believed in God. I mean, what if you were a priest and lost your faith? You can’t just quit. The reason I wonder this is because his faith seems to mean spirited and exclusionary and so willing to let others suffer for doctrinally shaky points, like condoms being bad. I always thought faith was bout doing good, rather than pointing out bad in others. You know, mote in your eye, plank in mine. Although Jesus did say a bunch of screwed up, mean things. so maybe he believes in the mean Jesus.
The last pope was highly concerned that George Bush might be the anti-christ. (No, I’m not making this up.) The new pope was the instigator of the Kerry being denied communion scandal. He issued a letter saying that it would be evil for Catholics to vote for Kerry. You can’t pick a single deciding factor for an election, but without this guy, Bush would have lost. (No, I’m not making this up.) So, if Bush is the antichrist, and Benedict (who picked a name fitting to a prophesy he was certainly aware of) steered people towards Bush, then the rapture is coming and all of us secular humanists are doomed. (It also means that all of the new pope’s gay-baiting is actually the work of Satan, so maybe we’re less doomed than you’d think.)
The problem with this “interpretation” is that it has a saint receiving prophesy from Satan. Saints don’t usually relay words from the devil as that does tend to disqualify them from sainthood. But this guy was sainted so long ago, maybe they did less checking back then. Also, why should the rapture be all at once? What if it’s just the slow death of faith?
Tags: Celesteh, Pope

Thesis: 70 pages – 12 point 1.5 spaces Century Gothic font, counting bibliography. 18,310 words, counting bibliography. Still awaiting edits from advisor on last chapter.

Grad school life: Yesterday I woke up at 10:00 AM and met Anthony Braxton at 11:00. after several minutes of fussing with cables in the EMS (which had all been recently disconnected for Jascha’s concert), I played through my concert program for him. (The 4 channel version of my Fred Phelps piece has quit working for some reason.) He asked me if I was going to do a piece with DeLay attacking the judiciary. No!!! No more english text. No more american politics! I must go to France next year.
We went for lunch with Jessica and then I went home and worked on my bibliography. Angela came over for dinner and then left to go to a concert and I kept working on my bibliography (some of my favorite citations are below. I know it’s boring. I don’t care. Cola talked me out of posting all 11 pages.) I worked on it until 2:30 AM and then walked Xena, who desperately wants more exercise in her life) and then I went to sleep. This morning, err… afternoon, I got out of bed at 1:00 and then fixed all of my end notes so they go with my bibliography instead of just being urls. Now I ponder dinner, but my cover is exceedingly bare. Maybe I’ll have nutella on wonder (wheat) bread.
Random complaints: I’m allergic to the toilet paper that Aaron bought. I have skin allergies. I have to use hippie shampoo or I itch a lot. Right now, I itch a lot. Out of food. Nearly out of dog food. Raining. Pop culture seems to be at war with art music. And music seems to get singled out a lot. Why? What are people afraid of?
When I was in the compulsory period of my education, the prohibition against drinking and driving was so emphasized that I thought that wanting to drive must be one of the effects of drinking. You would drink a glass of beer and the overwhelming urge to get into a car and drive would seize you, but you had to resist. So when I finally started consuming alcohol, I was steeled. I was not going to suddenly want to go for a joy ride! Although after so much repetition if this idea, the thought would creep into my head. Sometimes when I’m drunk (which is rare) I announce “I want to go for a drive!” But I do not go, because I have the mental toughness to resist.
So last night, as I was assembling my bibliography, I was forced to revisit all my sources for pundit material. I only had about 10 citation to go. I wanted to be done. But I was reaching mental break down. Finally, I got to the section where O’Reilly was asserting that gay rights would lead people to want to marry goats. I was in a suggestible stage! This normally wouldn’t happen!
I am engaged to Billy. We haven’t set a date, as we’re awaiting the results of our court decision.
No I don’t like goats in any sort of disturbing, ASPCA-alerting or naughty way. I just feel like I should marry one.
For our honeymoon, we’re taking the O’Reilly cruise to the Caribbean, which we understand has plenty of vegetarian fare as falafel is served at every meal. All guests get a complimentary loofah.
Tag: Celesteh

Catholic Church Attempts to Derail Gay Rights in Spain

Can we all go back to fucking up the life of the brain dead woman in Florida again? Maybe we can dig her up and reinsert her feeding tube.

“A law as profoundly iniquitous as this one is not an obligation, it cannot be an obligation. One cannot say that a law is right simply because it is law.”
. . .
“This is not a matter of choice: all Christians… must be prepared to pay the highest price, including the loss of a job.”

They’re calling for massive civil disobedience against other people people loving each other. God is apparently anti-love. Because God is love. He needs all that love for himself. We can’t have any for each other.
It’s a not-so-secret goal of the Vatican to re-unify all Christian churches under the papacy. Maybe they’re trying to start with Fred Phelps. “The new Pope has described homosexuality as objectively disordered and an intrinsic moral evil.” Sort of a highbrow way of saying “God hates fags,” isn’t it?
“Asked about the Spanish Bill, [Cardinal Alfonso Lopes Trujillo, head of the Pontifical Council on the Family] said:We cannot impose the iniquitous on people. . ..'” Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
(oh, heh, oops, I misread “iniquitous” as some funny form of “inquisitionous” which I took to mean something along the lines of “worthy of official inquiry and ecclesiastical punishment upto and including burning at the stake.” I’m standing by my pun.)
I can’t believe they made the head of the inquisition pope. I’m so upset about this.
Tags: Celesteh, Pope, Gay

Karlsberg, Jesse. “I had to open the bruise up to let some of the bruise blood come out to show them.” Silversand. December 09, 2004. Assessed April 21, 2005. <http://silversand.blogspot.com/2004/12/i-had-to-open-bruise-up-to-let-some-of.html>

online magazine

Bowman, David. “Citizen Flynt.” Salon.com. July 8, 2004. Assessed April 21, 2005. <http://www.salon.com/books/int/2004/07/08/flynt/index.html>

web page

Kuntz, Marcia Ed. “Who We Are” Media Matters For America. Assessed April 21, 2005. <http://mediamatters.org/etc/about.html>
“Truthful Translations of Political Speech.” DiyMedia.net. Assessed April 21, 2005. <http://www.diymedia.net/collage/truth.htm>

Discussion forum

Kahn, Doug. “Re: Burroughs and Burrows” Online Posting. Jan 31, 2005. d_cultuRe : panel > The P0litics of S0und / The Culture 0f Exchange. Tate Online: British and International Modern Art. Assessed April 21, 2005. <http://www.tate.org.uk/contact/forums/onlineevents/thread.jsp?forum=43&thread=2471&tstart=0&trange=15>

More info

A Guide for
Writing Research Papers Based on
Modern Language Association
(MLA) Documentation

Outstanding Questions

Ok, let’s say you quote Coulter as her comments were reported on Media Matters . . . Would that look like:

Coulter, Ann, “Coulter labeled Dems who question qualifications of Condoleezza Rice and Clarence Thomas as ‘racist'”. Ed. Marcia Kuntz. Media Matters for America. November 18, 2004. Assessed April 21, 2005. <http://mediamatters.org/items/200411180009>

Or would you omit the “Coulter, Ann” and list it as “Kuntz, Marcia Ed.” ?
You know, i’ve kind of fudged bibliographies in the past and nobody has noticed, but this is going into the library, so I want to get it right.
Tag: Celesteh

Thesis: done, pending advisor comments (I don’t really expect anything serious) and still needing bibliography. 60 pages.

Awareness: I showed up to work today and dutifully sat in the lab and answered questions during my office hours. It wasn’t for over an hour later until I remembered that I don’t have office hours on thursdays
Health: as a horse, but consuming alcohol in moderation (and not so moderation) every night is probably ungood.
Stress Level: see title
Recent Activities: Went for lunch at a place in town called the English Tea Garden. Doilies covered every surface. Jessica and I were the youngest people there by 40 years, easily. The food was really good. Last night: saw Andrew Dewar et al in concert. Brought Xena. She was kind of too loud. Party at my house afterwards. I drank aperitif instead of Jagermeister to stay sober, but it didn’t work. Tuesday night: Jascha & Philip’s concert. (I have no idea if Phillip spells his name with 1 or 2 l’s)
other updates: um, my attention has no wandered away from this blog post
Tags: Celesteh, Thesis

Many gay Catholics disappointed with cardinals’ choice for pope, seeing Ratzinger as church’s most outspoken foe of equal rights

Talking about how the gay catholic group Dignity was effected by the 1986 “Letter to the Bishops on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons.” The Chronicle says that “Local chapters of DignityUSA used to meet on church property, but after members publicly rejected the Vatican’s 1986 letter, they were no longer welcome, said Sam Sinnett, the national president.”
The letter to the bishops was released in English. Not latin or any other language. It’s extremely unusual for Vatican texts to be released in English. Since the letter warns against letting gay people talk to each other, it was clearly aimed directly at Dignity. It’s understandable why they would want to be perceived as having agency, but they would have been banned from catholic churches no matter what. Catholic churches are only for opposite-sex married people and celibate people. Everyone else should leave. So I did.
You know what the word “catholic” means? Universal.
Tags: Gay, Catholic, Dignity, Pope, Celesteh

Not but barely over an hour ago, the vatican announced the selection of a new pope. after the traditional white smoke rose from the chimney, a spokes person came forward to announce “popus hablam” “we have a pope.” The crowd burst into cheers as Pope Archie Bunker II made his first public appearance, blessing the crowd.

“My fellow Catholics,” the new Pope addressed the throngs, “My work as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has prepared me to take up this new role. I am prepared to take this church forward into the 21st century, by promoting celibacy, scapegoating gay people, stooping the evils of condoms and letting mysogony thrive wherever it’s seed lands, like the sewer spreading the word of the lord.” He then raised his hand in blessing over the crowd, “May God bless you and lead you from sin, keep you heterosexual. Amen.” the new pope then retreated into seclusion.
While pope Archie Bunker II was head of the CDC, they issued documents on a number of social issues, among them a tract On the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons which stated that such persons were “insitrinsically disordered” and in no case worthy of approval. The document recommended against allowing homosexual persons speak to each other, lest they become overwhelmed by temptation. The document was widely criticized as “pastoral” usually refers to loving care and avoids making condemnations. The CDC followed up to it’s controversial document with a tract On the Doctrinal Care of Homosexual Persons which called for public stonings. The then-head of the CDC, now pope told reporters, “You want hard line? you haven’t seen nothing yet! We would have called for the death penalty in the ‘pastoral’ document, but I guess we’re against that now.”
Tag: Pope

Despite the visibility of the same sex marriage movement, queers are not usually the focus of right wing pundits’ ire. Homophobia is often used as an aside. Alien others are compared to homosexuals to emphasize the otherness of the target group and the degeneracy they must therefore represent. Gayness is a symbol and gay people themselves are usually invisible. Therefore, because it was never a focus, I collected samples of homophobia, but did not engage it directly as an issue until late in my time at Wesleyan. My own status as an alien other informed my work, but was not directly represented.
During the spring of 2005, a furor erupted over a children’s TV series called Postcards from Buster. In one episode, a cartoon rabbit meets real life kids who have two moms. Nothing is ever said about this fact and the women are not identified as lesbians. The focus of the episode is on sugar production in Vermont. The show was so innocuous, that the left treated the situation as a joke. The Wonkette, with typical irony, described the episode as disappointing in its lack of objectionable content. (http://www.wonkette.com/politics/culture-war/too-hot-for-pbs-buster-does-vermont-035656.php) A Slate columnist jokingly questioned, “Is ‘maple sugaring’ actually code for some sort of sexual practice between women?” (http://slate.msn.com/id/2112706/) Most left wing commentaries seemed to ignore the entire event. Wesleyan’s own undergraduate queer community seemed to be entirely unaware of the controversy. A message to the campus’ queer mailing list, “endless acronym.” urged people to watch the episode when it aired locally, but never mentioned the controversy.
Much ado, however, was made of this issue by some right wing media figures like Bill O’Reilly, who frequently who has cautioned his viewers on multiple occasions that the recognition of same sex marriage will lead to the legalization of people marrying goats (http://mediamatters.org/items/200504150005) and thus bring about the destruction of our society as we know it. (http://mediamatters.org/items/200503310004) Most of the commentators seemed to be special homophobic guests, like spokespeople for Focus on the Family and not TV fixtures like O’Reilly.
O’Reilly was careful to explain that he wasn’t homophobic, but would equally block out all similar, heterosexual forms of degeneracy and perversion.

It’s not only about homosexuality . . .. I wouldn’t want Buster hopping into a bigamy situation in Utah. I wouldn’t want him hopping into an S&M thing in the East Village here . . . let’s keep Buster out of the sexual realm in all areas. Wouldn’t that be the best thing to do? (http://mediamatters.org/items/200502170007)

Dissecting the heteronormative nature of that remark is an exercise left to the reader. These comments, however, clearly are homophobic while he rather ridiculously claims that they are not.
O’Reilly’s comments made me yearn for the honesty of an honest-to-God homophobe. The obvious choice was Fred Phelps. This preacher became famous for showing up with picketers to funerals of AIDS victims. The signs the held said things like “God Hates Fags” “AIDS Kills Fags Dead” and sometimes would feature the name of the deceased and proclaim that he was now in hell. He showed up to Randy Shilts’ funeral in 1994 and was greeted by counter protesters armed with eggs. Phelps was an early adopter and has had a web page for the last several years at godhatesfags.com. He posts sermons there in mp3 format, all about one hour long. The tone of his sermons matches the tone of his protesting. Nevertheless, the words “lesbian” and “gay” have crept into his vocabulary, in addition to his preferred terms, “fags,” “dykes,” and “sodomites.”
Phelps is entirely occupied with the issue of queer civil rights and when he talks about political issues in other areas, he tends to see it as it pertains to the evil sodomite agenda. He tends to view anyone that does not spend as much time occupied with hating sodomites as much as he does as pro-gay. Therefore, he pickets Catholic churches, Billy Graham and other fundamentalists that most queers would perceive as homophobic. Phelps would affirm O’Reilly’s claim of tolerance and attack him for it. O’Reilly pales in comparison.
Phelps’s hour longer sermon was too long and too meandering to process automatically. It also was extremely distorted. He recorded it much too hot, which made the spaces between phrases fairly loud. I selected emblematic homophobic phrases from one sermon and created several shorter audio files containing those phrases. I used automatic processing on my O’Reilly sample, which came from Media Matters with other Buster- related content of “Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway [asserting] that it’s not an issue of ‘right versus left, but right versus wrong’ and that people ‘don’t want their kids looking at a cartoon with a bunch of lesbian mothers.’” (http://mediamatters.org/items/200502170007) I took the phrases pre-loaded from Phelps and the ones automatically discovered in O’Reilly and used the pitch finding algorithm that I developed for my Rush Limbaugh piece. I also used the same marimba sound. When that sound expands to the time scale of a spoken phrase, it becomes much more gamelan or gong-link.
I was concerned that re-using my Limbaugh code would make the pieces sound too similar. I went to Professor Kuivila for feedback. He told me that the pieces were adequately distinct and suggested that I take the Phelps piece further. Instead of merely showing similarity between right and far right discourse, Ron suggested that I add in mainstream commentary to show how all discourse contains homophobia, as we all have some degree of internalized homophobia. I found content from PBS’s News Hour commenting on the Buster controversy and incorporated it.
I then added in other commentary clips discussing Buster and other homophobic audio files I had been collecting, including the president excluding same sex marriage, an initially puzzling comment that poor school discipline was the fault of queers (this comment is discussed in a previous chapter) and a Fox News correspondent badgering Disney’s president about “Gay Days” in the theme park. (http://mediamatters.org/items/200408060012) All of these clips had in common an idea of incompatibility between queer relationships and ‘normal’ family life. Queers are unfit for marriage and, perhaps more importantly, we are dangerous to children. Children at Disneyland are not protected from us. Children in New Jersey cannot be educated because their governor is gay. Children across the nation are irreparably harmed by Buster commenting that one of the kids on the show “has a lot of moms.” (http://slate.msn.com/id/2112706/) The danger doesn’t seem to be just that the kids will turn gay, but they will become every kind of alien other. Violent, sexual, dangerous, perhaps animal, not quite civilized monsters, who exist outside of social norms.
I finished this piece only days before my concert. My original plan was to realize all of my pieces in stereo, so that I could use the chapel’s installed speakers, thus saving myself setup time and creating pieces that could be played virtually anywhere. I plugged my laptop into the chapel’s sound system and was met with Rev Fred Phelps screaming about fire and brimstone and sodomites burning in hell. The chapel setting gave him authority. Church is his own turf. His damnation seemed almost reasonable. I could not compete with him through the architectural speakers. Instead, I routed all the voices through two small speakers on the stage. The gong sounds went through the architectural speakers alone. They are introduced slowly as the piece progresses and linger after the voices end, getting the last word. The greater authority of the musical sounds and their persistence fills an allegory of music triumphing over politics.

Tags: Thesis, Fred Phelps, Bill O’Reilly, Buster, SugarTime, Wesleyan, Celesteh

I’ll give you a clue. This person wrote (according to the article), “that court-ordered school-desegregation plans have led to ‘illiterate students knifing one another between acts of sodomy in the stairwell.'” Oh, that ignorant, violent and sexually untamed alien other has come for our children! *shriek!* Yeah, Time also identified Protest Warrior guys as lefties. Time‘s capacity to screw up facts, do terrible surface treatments and get things wrong ought to be legendary if it is not already.

What else am I learning from Time? Um, Ann Coulter is really quite huggable and blushes sometimes in public! Of, and she’s soooo sexy! She’s complicated! Misunderstood! Humorous! Ironic! Full of witty satire demonizing black people and queers! (The demonizing black folks and queers line is my added sarcastic bit, you see, Ann’s just trying to push buttons, tee hee)
“And of course the biggest case Coulter ever helped handle as an attorney (she got her law degree from the University of Michigan in 1988) was a sexual-harassment claim of an unsophisticated woman against her powerful former boss.” Three guesses what this is referring to! Three guesses about Ann Coulter’s softer, more female-friendly side! Who is the boss? That’s right! Bill Clinton! The woman helped by Coulter is former playboy model Paula Jones! Remember the Starr Report? The impeachment? Oh yeah . . .
The verdict? Coulter rules! ” The officialdom of punditry, so full of phonies and dullards, would suffer without her humor and fire.”

Update: Media Matters Smackdown. Unlike the “smackdown” in Coulter’s latest column where she claims that the folks who threw pies at her had their bones broken by conservatives. Not true. Latest column. Too much work for time. Maybe they rely on “Communists for Kerry” to do their research for them.
Tag: Ann Coulter